BlueWallet brings zero-configuration Lightning payments to iOS and Android

BlueWallet has just released support for the Lightning Network. Being a 2nd layer scaling solution, Lightning promises low-fees and instant payments. But as a drawback brings a lot of complexities and unfamiliarities to unsuspecting users.

Completely aligned with Bitcoin’s “be your own bank” for sovereign individuals, Lightning requires users to run their own Lightning nodes (besides their own Bitcoin node), open and manage state channels with other nodes (this is what makes a network), maintain liquidity (both incoming and outgoing) in channels, and basically, do a hard ‘node operator’ work. This is the cost of independence from financial institutions.

Our approach to Lightning is different.

We decided to hide the complexity of running a node under the hood and take over the work of hub operator.

This makes the user experience smooth, bringing Lightning payments to anyone who is at least remotely acquainted with cryptocurrencies and mobile wallets.

We called it LndHub, an opensource wrapper around LND. This is “3rd layer solution” (as we jokingly call it; of course this is not real 3rd layer).

This is how it works: the user sends his bitcoins to a dedicated top-up address, and this balance is added to his account on LndHub. Then, the user can use this balance to pay Lightning invoices. But under the hood, it’s actually LndHub who pays the invoice, deducting the user’s account balance. It works the same way when the user wants to receive a Lightning payment — it’s LndHub who creates Lightning invoice and actually receives coins on one of its channels.

Zoom image will be displayed This has its drawbacks. Basically, user transfers his funds in custody to a 3rd party (and we all know that trusted 3rd parties are security holes, thanks to Nick Szabo). But how much of a problem is that? Let’s think a bit about it. Trust is minimized to an absolute minimum required to carry its duties. On the other hand, Lightning is expected for day-to-day use, and how much the average user usually has in his pocket for daily expenses? Probably, $50 for groceries and coffee? A fair tradeoff risking those for an exchange of usability.

Of course, on-chain Bitcoins private keys should be in full user’s control. Not your keys — not your coins, as they say. We are thinking of it as “savings” account (as opposed to Lightning — “current” account).

Other drawbacks include centralisation of the network. Given lots of users start using LndHub, amount of funds and liquidity it holds will also grow, turning LndHub into a major Hub on the network. This was anticipated in the dawn of Lightning development, and we don’t see a problem with that. Network still remains open, and is free to morph and mutate as per current economic reality.